James Durstein Wins Federal Court Order on CME Conditions

James Durstein Wins Federal Court Order on CME Conditions

In Florida, there are multiple reasons for removing bodily injury damages cases from state court to federal court. One is that the law on getting compulsory medical examinations is more favorable to the defense in federal court.
In state court, Florida law allows plaintiffs to condition compulsory medical examinations on videographers, court reporters, and plaintiffs' attorneys being allowed to attend. In federal court, plaintiffs must show "good cause" before such outsiders are allowed to attend compulsory medical examinations.
On August 22, 2019, James Durstein won a federal court order denying a plaintiff's motion to bring his attorney or a videographer to the examination. James opposed the motion. The court ruled that "good cause" requires the plaintiff to show "a special circumstance" warranting the presence of a third party at the examination. The court ruled that, in this case, the plaintiff failed to make any such showing. If you would like a copy of the order, please call James or send him an email.


James Durstein


904-346-3166 ext 3034


Brian Guter and James Durstein frequently remove lawsuits to federal court, oppose motions to remand to state court, and litigate cases in federal court.  If you have any questions about the advantages of federal court over state court in bodily injury damages cases in northeast Florida, contact James or Brian.

Brian Guter


904-346-3166 ext 3026


  • Bad faith and extra-contractual damages
  • Commercial disputes
  • Construction disputes and defects
  • False claims
  • Insurance fraud
  • Insurance and coverage issues
  • Motor vehicle accidents
  • Negligence claims
  • Premises liability
  • Products liability
  • Professional liability
  • SIU investigations


The Florida Bar regulates advertising by lawyers, and may consider lawyers’ websites a form of advertising. 

  • The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements.
  • The material on this web site is informational only. We give no legal advice on this web site.
  • Results may not be typical. You may not have as beneficial a result.



Defense Verdict in Product Liability Lawsuit

June 18, 2018

  In a three-week February 2018 jury trial, Michael Regan successfully…

Read More

James Durstein’s Defense Verdict Affirmed on Appeal

May 20, 2018

In March 2016, after a five-day jury trial in which the…

Read More


November 3, 2017

The O’Hara Law Firm, P.A. is pleased to sponsor this year’s…

Read More

Political Drama in Florida Judicial Appointments

September 3, 2017

  The conservative/liberal dichotomy of Supreme Court Justices influences Supreme Court…

Read More

Welcome, Jennifer Cassady

July 9, 2017

We are pleased that Jennifer Cassady has joined our firm, bringing almost 14 years of insurance defense experience.

Read More

Bad faith claims with UM claims: Abate or dismiss?

July 9, 2017

This is another good reason to remove lawsuits for UM benefits from state court to federal court where such is possible.

Read More

Court Approves Jury Instruction On Exception To Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine

July 7, 2017

The dangerous instrumentality doctrine is unique to the State of Florida.

Read More

Jury Limits Past Medical Expense Award

June 30, 2017

Mike persuaded a jury to limit an award of past medical expenses because the amounts claimed were unreasonable.

Read More

Michael “MP3” Regan vs. the Cake!

June 22, 2017

On March 29, 2017, Mike Regan and his wife, Stephanie, celebrated their son’s first birthday.

Read More

Steve O’Hara Holds on to Favorable Defense Verdict

May 17, 2017

Steve O’Hara recently won orders from the trial court denying a plaintiff’s motions for new trial and to set aside a defense verdict.

Read More


O’Hara Law Firm, P.A.



4811 Beach Boulevard, Suite 303
Jacksonville, FL  32207


Leave a Comment